Home
People Research
Publications Teaching
Positions available Lab fun Useful
links
Project: Drosophila behavioral genetics
People: J. Gleason, B.
Sanderson, F. Ighoyivwi
Description:
Speciation is responsible for the diversity of life on earth. The
process of speciation requires the evolution of reproductive isolation
between populations. Differentiation can result from postmating
isolation (hybrids are sterile or inviable) or premating isolation
(species do not mate). Although the genetics of postmating
isolation have received much attention, the genetics of premating
isolation have not.
We are studying courtship traits that contribute to premating
isolation. Drosophila simulans
and D. sechellia differ in
two courtship signals and preferences. The first signal,
courtship song, is produced by the male to stimulate the female.
Females greatly prefer the song of their own species and only
reluctantly mate in the presence of a different species’ song.
The second signal is a contact pheromone in the form of a cuticular
hydrocarbon. D. sechellia
females have a different major cuticular hydrocarbon than D. simulans females. This
affects sexual isolation asymmetrically because D. simulans males discriminate
against D. sechellia females
whereas D. sechellia males do
not discriminate.
Two major approaches are being taken towards genetics analyses of these
traits. The first approach uses quantitative trait loci mapping
and recombinant inbred lines to estimate the number of loci, their
genomic locations and the direction of effect for both signals and
preferences. The results will indicate the relative effects of drift
and sexual selection on each trait and thereby provide information
about processes of speciation. The second approach uses
introgression and recombinant inbred lines to isolate qualitative
effects of genetic factors and to identify changes in gene expression
using microarray analysis.
Funding: NSF
Project: Courtship song evolution in the D. saltans group
People: J. Gleason, E. Schmidt, J. Cooper
Description:
Courtship in many animal species consists of specific signals sent
between the male and female prior to mating. These signals
provide species recognition and may be subject to sexual
selection. Courtship in Drosophila
melanogaster starts with a male orienting towards the female,
tapping her abdomen with his legs (probably to detect chemical cues
through receptors in his feet), vibrating his wings, usually to produce
courtship song, and licking of her genitalia. Many other
Drosophila species do the same behaviors as well as perform a variety
of wing movements (Spieth 1952). The behaviors can progress in
any order, and behaviors can be repeated. The male will often
attempt copulation and, when the female acquiesces, copulation proceeds.
Courtship song has a large effect on female choice in D. melanogaster. Male wing
vibration produces two types of courtship song, sine song and pulse
song. Sine song is a low frequency hum, which has a stimulatory
effect on the female. Pulse song consists of a series of low
frequency pulses . The time between each pulse, the interpulse
interval (IPI) is important for species mate recognition. IPI is highly
species-specific in the D.
melanogaster group. Females mate much more quickly in the
presence of conspecific song than in the presence of heterospecific
song. Although song is not absolutely necessary for mating,
playing song partially restores the mating success of mute (wingless)
males.
Courtship song has been studied in a limited number of Drosophila
species groups. Although the pattern of evolutionary change for
the D. melanogaster species
group is modification of IPI, other species groups have variation in
patterns . In particular, song patterns in the D. willistoni group can be used to
identify species, however, they cannot be used to reconstruct the
phylogeny of the group (Ritchie and Gleason 1995; Gleason and Ritchie
1998). The lack of phylogenetic signal implies that there has
been sexual selection for song, indicating that song may be important
for mate choice (Gleason and Ritchie 1998). Furthermore, from an
analysis of the songs with premating and postmating isolation, it is
clear that song evolves very quickly (Gleason and Ritchie 1998).
Such differentiation is not seen in all species groups. In some
species groups, species are not well differentiated , thus song
divergence may result from genetic drift, indicating that song may not
be as important for species recognition.
Project: Signaling in
D. nebulosa
People: J. Gleason, A. Vezeau
Description:
Project: Waxmoth behavioral genetics
People: Y. Zhou, M. Greenfield, J. Gleason (and others in the
Greenfield lab)
Description:
The presence of genetic variation for male sexual traits such as mating
signals remains a major problem in evolutionary biology. Female
choice often favors exaggerated mating signals and is thereby expected
to reduce genetic variation greatly, yet recent surveys indicate that
substantial variation remains in many species. This problem has
been addressed in an acoustic pyralid moth, Achroia grisella (Lesser wax
moth), in which males broadcast an ultrasonic mating song attractive to
females up to several meters distant. Playback experiments show
that female A. grisella
prefer male songs that are distinguished by several key features, and
breeding experiments demonstrate substantial genetic variance, and
heritability, for these song features. Further breeding
experiments and tests with inbred lines indicate that genetic tradeoffs
between life history characters and male song attractiveness are not
responsible for maintaining this variance. That is, attractive
singers are larger, do not take longer to attain that size, survive
longer, and spend more time singing on nightly and lifetime
bases. On the other hand, environmental variation over space and
time, combined with interactions between genotypes and the environment,
may contribute to the genetic variance observed for male song
attractiveness: Certain lines exhibit superior attractiveness
when developing under a favorable environmental regime but show marked
declines under stress, while other lines exhibit only modest
performance in favorable environments but show little reduction in
stress; that is, no one genetic variant exhibits the superior
performance in all environments. However, these findings have
thus far been restricted to observations of highly inbred or
artificially-selected laboratory populations, and the actual
significance of environmental variation and genotype x environment
interaction for maintaining genetic variance in natural populations is
unknown.
We are extending the above studies to determine whether 1) the range of
responses to environmental gradients and 2) the environmental variation
that actually occur in the field are likely to maintain the levels of
genetic variance observed for male song attractiveness. In
particular, we will determine whether the level of genetic variance
reflects the amount of environmental variation a population has
experienced, and whether genetic variants that exhibit maximum
attractiveness in both favorable and stressful environments occur. We
will also determine whether variation in female preference for male
signals, and the response of the female preference trait to
environmental variation, contribute to genetic variance for male song
attractiveness. This possibility will be augmented via a parallel
molecular genetic (quantitative trait locus, QTL) analysis of inbred
lines in which they will examine the covariance between genes that
influence male song and female preference traits.
Funding: NSF