POLS 613 Comparative U.S. State Politics

Spring 2005

Professor Haider-Markel

Department of Political Science

504 Blake Hall, University of Kansas

 

Guidelines for Research Paper

            Students are required to prepare a research paper on a topic of their choice dealing with state politics and government.  However, I must clear each topic first.  To be cleared by me students must submit an abstract outlining their research paper.  Students are also encouraged to meet with me at their earliest convenience to discuss their paper topic. You should choose a topic as soon as possible. The longer you wait the less time I will have to assist you in your efforts.

 

            Your abstract is due at the beginning of class on Thurs., March 3.  The abstract must include:

            1) at least one paragraph describing your topic, why the topic is important, and what question(s) you hope to answer.  You must state your research question or questions as a question with a question mark.

            2) a list of at least three articles or books you plan to use for your research paper.  You can use one Internet site as a possible source.  Failure to provide possible references will constitute an incomplete assignment.  Do not list a journal; you must reference a specific article rather than a whole journal.

 

            Your research paper is due in my office (405 Blake Hall) or in my mailbox (504 Blake Hall) on or before May 10 at the start of Class.  I reserve the right not to accept late papers.  If a late paper is accepted, grade deductions will be made.

 

            The goal of this assignment is for you to connect the principles we have been discussing in class with a specific case or cases. There are clearly many topics you might address, including state politics issues we have not covered.

 

            The paper must be 8 to 12 pages and must include all of the following elements:

            1. one or more specific statements of why the topic is important (e.g. this topic is important because….).

            2. statement of main question you plan to answer with your research, stated as a question (meaning with a question mark at the end).

            3. a paragraph stating how your paper is related to class readings and/or lectures (e.g. this topic is related to class because….).

            4. citations of source literature (meaning citing sources of facts and ideas in your paper that are not your own and including a full list of works cited at the end of your paper).  In your final paper you may not use more than 3 Internet sources.

 

If you fail to include all of the above elements, you will lose points on the paper.  Try not to use quotations.  Instead, paraphrase another author by rewriting the statement in your own words and citing the source of the original text or idea.

 

            All papers should be stapled together in the following order: title page (spend some time with the title--a lame title really kills a paper), main text of paper, any endnotes, any tables, any figures, and a complete list of references.

 

            All papers must be typed and double-spaced. Although I will not intentionally grade organization, grammar, and spelling, poor execution of each makes a paper difficult to read and may result in a lower grade. Please use headings and sub-headings to divide your paper into sections.  If you have a problem deciding where to place headings you probably need to redesign the organization of your paper.  An example of paper structure using headings and subheadings would be:

 

Introduction

            Topic and Statement of Importance

            Statement of Research Question

            Statement of Relation to Class

Historical Overview and Background

Evidence Pertaining to Key Research Question

Conclusion

References

Tables/Figures

 

            Please refer to the Style Manual for Political Science that is part of your reading packet.  The manual will assist you in citations, references, organization, and the use of specific words.

 

            If I suspect you did not write your paper or that you plagiarized another author I will discuss the problem with you.  If I have at least one piece of evidence to support my suspicions you will receive zero points for the paper and you will fail the class.

 

            Please don't hesitate to approach me with questions or concerns about your paper.  I am willing to read and return first drafts of your paper.  These drafts will not be graded and will not influence your grade except insofar as my comments may help you to improve your paper.

 

Writing Centers

            Please note that KU has satellite writing centers called Writer's Roosts.  The consultants there will work with you as you prepare drafts of papers; they do not edit your papers, but they do help you meet the goals of your assignments.  Writer's Roosts are open in several locations across campus; please check www.ukans.edu/~writing <http://www.ukans.edu/~writing> for current locations and hours.  Drop-ins and appointments are welcomed, and there is no charge for services.  For more information, call 864-2399 or writing@raven.cc.ukans.edu <mailto:writing@raven.cc.ukans.edu>.

 

Possible Sources for Articles

Do not take all your sources from one book or from popular magazines.

 

Below is a list of national political science and politics journals as well as a few books.  The journals are NOT to be listed as citation sources, only articles from the journals. 

 

American Journal of Political Science
American Political Science Review
Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report
Governing: The Magazine of States and Localities

Journal of Politics

Legislative Studies Quarterly

National Journal

Policy Studies Journal

Political Research Quarterly

Polity

Presidential Studies Quarterly

Public Opinion Quarterly

Publius: The Journal of Federalism

Social Science Quarterly
State Politics and Policy Quarterly

 

Possible Topics

            The following are possible topics for your paper.  You are free to use one of these topics or to choose one of your own.

 

How do different state laws on voting influence participation and election outcomes?

 

Review of the literature on the impact of divided government in the states: What impact does it have?  Does this literature differ from the literature on divided government at the national level?

 

What do we know about interest groups and direct democracy?

 

How do state legislative institutions differ and what impact does it have on policy?

 

Why have some states deregulated utilities while others have not?

 

What are states’ experiences with utility deregulation?: success, failure?

 

What has been the impact of term limits on state politics and policymaking?

 

How have states experimented with charter schools?  What’s the impact on education?

 

Is there really anything to the notion of state political culture?

 

Why have some states have laws allowing the use of marijuana for medical purposes?

 

Should states pass laws banning mobile phone use while driving?

 

What are the differences between how state Attorneys General operate?

 

Why should states take action in a particular policy area instead of the federal government?

 

When should local governments take responsibility for an issue rather than state governments?

 

Why have elections for state office become so expensive?  What does this mean for democratic politics in the states?

 

Why has the number of state interest groups grown so rapidly in the last 20 years?  Is this something we should be concerned about?

 

Citation and Reference Examples

            The general rule is that you must cite a source for any information or ideas that you did not previously know or come up with on your own.  Citations should appear in parenthesis in the text as follows: (author(s) name year, page number(s)).  Also, you should cite at the end of the sentence that describes the information from your source.  Do not simply put cites at the end of paragraphs in an attempt to provide a single source for the whole paragraph.  For example, the following is a proper citation:

 

            Throughout its rise in the mid-1800s and its second surge in the early 1900s, the Klan typically operated as a paramilitary group, arming and training themselves to harass, injure, and kill African Americans and white sympathizers throughout the South (Berlet and Lyons 2000).   And although the Klan did not use military uniforms at the time, the white robes and hoods clearly identified members as part of a distinct organization.  But the use of paramilitary structure by factions of the KKK was most evident beginning in the 1970s as the “New Klan” adopted military garb and structure under the guidance of David Duke (Coates 1987; Toy 1989; Gibson 1994; Stern 1996; Berlet and Lyons 2000).  Further, it was also during the 1970s that the KKK began recruiting from military bases for the first time (Toy 1989, 142; also see Bennett 1988, 347)--a practice emulated by the militia movement in the 1990s (Stern 1996).

 

            Your list of references must include all the sources you cite in the text of your paper and cannot include sources you do not cite.  Although I prefer that you use a style manual, the key here is to simply use a consistent format.  The following are acceptable reference styles:

 

Light, Paul C.  1991.  The President’s Agenda, Rev. ed.  Baltimore: Johns Hopkins.

 

Willen, Mark.  1993.  “Clinton Picks Freeh for FBI After Ousting Sessions.”

            Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report 51:1962-63.

 

            If you cite a web page, the same rules apply except that there may not be an author named or a date of publication.  In those cases use the organization as the author and the date you viewed the website as the publication date.  Also be sure to note the title of the page you are looking at, not the homepage, and be sure to include the web page address.  An example of a reference for a web page would appear as follows:

 

Earth Liberation Front.  2002.  Statement from the Earth Liberation Front Press

            Office, September 4, 2002.  Earth Liberation Front (September 30, 2002).

            http://www.earthliberationfront.com/news/2002/090402.shtml

 

            Again, do not hesitate to ask questions or to come see me.


 

Grading Rubric For Writing Assignments                                        Professor Haider-Markel

Task

4

3

2

1

0

Creativity/Originality

A lot of creatively in approach or topic

Significant creatively in approach or topic

Some creatively in approach or topic

Minimum creative effort

Not at all original or creative

Statement of Research Question

Clear, strong statement of research question; clear focus

Understandable statement of research question

Statement of unfocused question

Very Weak or unclear

No statement

Statement of the Importance of Topic

Clear, strong statement of topic importance

Understandable statement of topic importance

Somewhat Understandable statement of topic importance

Very Weak or unclear

No statement

Statement of Relationship to Class

Clear, strong statement of how topic is related to the class

Understandable statement of how topic is related to the class

Somewhat Understandable statement of how topic is related to the class

Very Weak or unclear

No statement

Citation and References

All information is properly cited and references are listed at end

Most information is properly cited and references are listed at end

Some information is properly cited and some references are listed at end

Almost no information is properly cited and references are not listed at end

No information is properly cited and references are not listed at end

Organization and Style

Writing shows good planning. There are bridges between paragraphs and ideas are explained well

Writing shows good planning and ideas are explained well. Paragraphs and sentences are arranged appropriately

Clearer paragraphing is needed. Too much jumping from idea or source to another

Very few if any logical connection between points; reread and rewrite

Pretty much stream-of-consciousness

Detail

Details enhance the writing and provide information in depth

Uses enough detail to explain the topic

Some effort to use details to explain the topic, but some merely listed or are unnecessarily repetitious

Few details or details unrelated to the topic

No details whatsoever

Grammar and Spelling

Almost no errors

A lot of errors; more care needed

Clearly the author never proofread the paper; errors so severe the paper was difficult to read

N/a

N/a