POLS 820: Policy Formulation and Adoption

Spring 2003

 

Department of Political Science

University of Kansas

 

Professor Haider-Markel                                                 Thursday 4:30-7:30

e-mail: prex@ku.edu                                                               Blake 207

Office Hours: MWF 1:00-4:00                                         Office: 405 Blake

or by appointment                                                                  Phone: 864-9034

web: http://lark.cc.ukans.edu/~prex/

 

Goals and Scope of the Course

 

            This course provides a survey of the literature on the institutional, socioeconomic, and political forces influencing the formulation and adoption of public policy, as well as policy change at all levels of government.  Topics include, problem definition, agenda setting, and the methods of decisionmaking.  The course will largely focus on state and national policy, but some attention will be paid to local and comparative policy.  This is a research seminar so students will be required to conduct and original research project on policy formation.

 

Grading and Responsibilities

 

Reading Assignments:  The reading assignments are listed in the attached course outline.  All students are expected to complete the required readings prior to each class session.  Class sessions will be conducted as seminars and are only valuable if students are familiar with the material. A student’s grade will reflect his or her participation in class.  I also recommend that students regularly read and view national news.  Please note that each week also includes a list of supplemental readings.  While I do not expect you to read all of this material, you may want to use some of these materials for your research paper.  These readings will also help you to understand the literature you should become familiar with as you proceed with your graduate career.

 

            The following books are available for purchase in the bookstore:

 

Anderson, James.  2000.  Public Policymaking: An Introduction.  4th ed. Boston:

            Houghton-Mifflin. 

 

Baumgartner, Frank R., and Bryan D. Jones. Eds.  2002.  Policy Dynamics.  Chicago:

            The University of Chicago Press.

 

Baumgartner, Frank R., and Bryan D. Jones.  1993.  Agendas and Instability in

            American Politics.  Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

 

Klingmann, Hans-Dieter, Richard I. Hofferbert, and Ian Budge.  1994.  Parties, Policies

            And Democracy.  Boulder: Westview Press.

 

Ringquist, Evan J.  1993.  Environmental Protection at the State Level.  Armonk, NY:

            M. E. Sharpe.

 

Rochefort, David A., and Roger W. Cobb.  Eds. 1994.  The Politics of Problem

            Definition: Shaping the Policy Agenda.  Lawrence. KS: University Press

            of Kansas.

 

Sabatier, Paul A.  1999.  Theories of the Policy Process.  Boulder, CO: Westview.

 

Note: you will also be assigned articles that are available as photocopies in the political science office, 504 Blake Hall.  If you want the staff to make copies for you, please give them at least 3 days notice.  You can also copy the articles yourself, and many of the articles can be downloaded from JSTOR through the KU Libraries webpage.

 

Reaction Papers:  The reaction papers will cover the reading for each week.  You are to write a three to four-page paper that summarizes the week’s reading from a critical perspective and/or that develops ideas and hypotheses for your research paper.

 

            Reaction papers do not have to be negative assessments of the readings, but a negative critique usually provides more opportunities to show your understanding of the readings.  Even in a positive critique, however, you can show the weaknesses and strengths of the readings.  Most often a positive critique argues how and why the authors could have gone further than they did.

 

            All reaction papers should be typed and double spaced. Although I will not intentionally grade organization, grammar, and spelling, poor execution of each makes a paper difficult to read and will likely result in a lower grade. You are responsible for at least five reaction papers.  Each week I will inform you as to whether or not a reaction paper is due the following week.  Late reaction papers will only be accepted in cases of emergency.

 

Presentation/Discussion Leader:  Each student will be required to give a 20-minute presentation on the selected weeks’ readings.  During the same class session the student will be responsible for engaging the class in discussion of the readings.  I will determine which student is presenting in a given week.  In a sense, the presentation will simply be an extended reaction paper but is also meant to prepare you for presenting your work at conferences.  Your presentation should review the main points of each reading, outline problems and weaknesses, and tie the readings together.  To lead discussion, the student should prepare a list of questions to pose to the class.

 

Research Paper:  Each student will be required to write a research paper that either extends existing theoretical knowledge or tests some portion of an existing theoretical framework.  The paper must integrate the course readings but you are free to incorporate relevant outside readings.  You will be free to choose topics from any substantive policy area and any policy theory—to assist you I will provide a list of possible topics.  I will provide you with more detailed instructions concerning content, format, and length early in the semester.  Each student will be required to meet with me to clear his/her paper topic.  MPA student requirements for the paper will differ from those of Ph.D. candidates.  Be assured that I will work closely with each of you on your papers.

 

            Final Grades will be determined on the following basis:

 

                        Reaction Papers                       30%

                        Presentation                             10%

                        Class Participation                 10%

                        Research Paper                       50%

 

Students with Disabilities

 

            Any student in this seminar who has a disability that may prevent him/her from fully demonstrating her/his abilities should contact me personally as soon as possible so we can discuss accommodations necessary to ensure full participation and facilitate the educational opportunity.

 

Instructor Availability

 

            Students wishing to meet with me can do so before or after class, during office hours (listed at top of first page), or by appointment.  My time is flexible and I can arrange to meet with you on your schedule.  Please be aware that the easiest way to reach me is via e-mail -- I check my e-mail several times a day.  prex@ku.edu

In an emergency you can reach me at: 841-1822.

 

 

Course Outline and Weekly Schedule

 

Week 1: Introduction and Rationale for the Course

 

No Required Readings

 

Week 2: Overview of the Field and Introduction to Policy Theory

 

Required Readings

Anderson, James.  2000.  Public Policymaking: An Introduction.  4th ed. Boston:

            Houghton-Mifflin. 

 

Sabatier, Paul A.  1999.  “The Need for Better Theories.”  In Theories of the Policy

            Process.  Ed. Paul A. Sabatier.  Boulder, CO: Westview.  Pp. 3-18.

 

DeLeon, Peter.  1999.  “The Stages Approach to the Policy Process: What Has it

            Done? Where is it Going?  In Theories of the Policy

            Process.  Ed. Paul A. Sabatier.  Boulder, CO: Westview.  Pp. 19-34.

 

Schlager, Edella, and William Blomquist.  1996.  “A Comparison of Three

            Emerging Theories of the Policy Process.” Political Research Quarterly

            49(3):651-672.

 

Schlager, Edella.  1999.  “A Comparison of Frameworks, Theories, and

            Models of Policy Process.”  In Theories of the Policy Process.  Ed. Paul

            A. Sabatier.  Boulder, CO: Westview.  Pp. 233-260.

 

Supplemental Readings

Bentley, Arthur F.  1908.  The Process of Government.  Evenston, IL: Principia Press.

 

Lasswell, Harold.  1936.  Politics: Who Gets What, When and How.  New York:

            McGraw Hill.

 

Schattschneider, E. E.  1960.  The Semi-Sovereign People.  New York: Holt,

            Reinhardt and Winston.

 

Dahl, Robert.  1961.  Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City.

            New Haven: Yale University.

 

Polsby, Nelson.  1984.  Political Innovation in America.  New Haven, CT: Yale

            University Press.

 

Janoski, Thomas, and Alexander Hicks.  1994.  The Comparative Political Economy

            Of The Welfare State.  Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

 

Lester, James P., and Joseph Stewart, Jr.  2000.  Public Policy: An Evolutionary

            Approach.  2nd ed.  Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Press.

 

Week 3: Public Policy Research Methods and Data Problems

 

Required Readings

Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., and Bradford S. Jones.  1997. “Time is of the Essence:

            Event History Models in Political Science.”  American Journal of Political

            Science 41(4):

 

Western, Bruce.  1995.  “Concepts and Suggestions for Robust Regression Analysis.”

            American Journal of Political Science 39(3):786-817.

 

Beck, Nathaniel, and Jonathan N. Katz.  1995.  “What to do (and not to do) with Time-

            Series Cross-Section Data.”   American Political Science Review 89(3):

            634-647.

 

Beck, Nathaniel, Jonathan N. Katz, and Richard Tucker.  1998.  “Taking Time

            Seriously: Time-Series-Cross-Section Analysis with a Binary Dependent

            Variable.”  American Journal of Political Science 42(4):1260-1288.

 

Best, Samuel J. 1999.  “The Sampling Problem in Measuring Policy Mood: An

            Alternative Solution.”  Journal of Politics 61(3):721-40.

 

Gill, Jeff.  1999.  “The Insignificance of Null Hypothesis Significance Testing.”

            Political Research Quarterly 52(3):647-74.

 

King, Gary, Michael Tomz, and Jason Wittenberg.  2000.  “Making the Most of

            Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and Presentation.”  American

            Journal of Political Science 44(2):347-61.

 

Supplemental Readings

Sage publication titles: Understanding Regression Analysis, Regression Diagnostics,

            Logit Modeling, Maximum Likelihood Estimation, and Pooled Times Series

            Analysis.

 

Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., and Renee M. Smith.  1998.  “Investigating Political

            Dynamics Using Fractional Integration Methods.” American Journal of

            Political Science 42(2):661-689.

 

Woolley, John T.  2000.  “Using Media-Based Data in Studies of Policy Processes”

            American Journal of Political Science 44(1):156-73.

 

Jackman, Simon.  2000.  “Estimation and Inference via Bayesian Simulation: An

            Introduction to Markov Chain Monte Carlo.”  American Journal of Political

            Science 44(2):375-404.

 

Week 4: Perspectives on Policy Formulation and Adoption I: Problem Definition and Agenda Setting

 

Required Readings

Stone, Deborah A.  1989.  “Causal Stories and the Formation of Policy Agendas.”

            Political Science Quarterly 104(2):281-300.

 

Rochefort, David A., and Roger W. Cobb.  eds.  1994.  The Politics of Problem

            Definition: Shaping the Policy Agenda.  Lawrence, KS: University Press of

            Kansas.

 

Cobb, Michael D., and James H. Kuklinski.  1997.  “Changing Minds: Political

            Arguments and Political Persuasion.”  American Journal of Political Science

            41(1):88-121.

 

Kellstedt, Paul M. 2000. “Media Framing and the Dynamics of Racial Policy

            Preferences.”  American Journal of Political Science 44(2):245-60.

 

Supplemental Readings

Schattschneider, E. E.  1960.  The Semi-Sovereign People.  New York: Holt,

            Reinhardt and Winston.

 

Dahl, Robert.  1961.  Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City.

            New Haven: Yale University.

 

Bachrach, Peter, and Morton Baratz.  1963.  “Decisions and Non-Decisions.”

            American Political Science Review  57:632-42.

 

Walker, Jack.  1977.  “Setting the Agenda in the U. S. Senate: A Theory of Problem

            Selection.”  British Journal of Political Science  7:423-46.

 

Cook, F. L., T. R. Tyler, E. G. Goetz, M. T. Gordon, D. R. Leff, & H. L. Molotch. 1983.

            Media and Agenda-Setting: Effects on the Public, Interest Group Leaders, Policy

            Makers, and Policy. Public Opinion Quarterly, 57, 16-35.

 

Riker, William H.  1986.  The Art of Political Manipulation.  New Haven: Yale

            University Press.

 

Stone, Deborah A.  1988. Policy Paradox and Political Reason.  Glenview, IL:

            Scott, Foresman.

 

Bosso, C. J.  1989.  “Setting the Agenda: Mass Media and the Discovery of Famine in

            Ethiopia.” In M. Margolis and G. Mauser (Eds.), Manipulating Public Opinion.

            Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.

 

Iyengar, Shanto.  1991.  Is Anyone Responsible?  How Television Frames Political

            Issues.  Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

 

Iyengar, Shanto, and Donald R. Kinder.  1987.  News That Matters: Television and

            American Opinion.  Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

 

Lupia, Arthur.  1992.  “Busy Voters, Agenda Control, and the Power of Information.”

            American Political Science Review 86(2):390-403.

 

Jones, Bryan D.  1994.  Reconceiving Decision-Making in Democratic Politics:

            Attention, Choice, and Public Policy.  Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

 

Lupia, Arthur.  1994.  “Shortcuts Versus Encyclopedias: Information and Voting

            Behavior in California Insurance Reform Elections.”  American Political

            Science Review 88:63-76.

 

Portz, John.  1996.  “Problem Definitions and Policy Agendas: Shaping the

            Educational Agenda in Boston.”  Policy Studies Journal  24:371-86.

 

Boeckelman, Keith.  1997.  “Issue Definition in State Economic Development

            Policy.”  Policy Studies Journal 25(2):286-302.

 

Week 5: Perspectives on Policy Formulation and Adoption III

 

Required Readings

Bendor, Jonathan and Terry M. Moe.  1986.  “Agenda Control, Committee Capture and

            The Dynamics of Institutional Politics.” American Political Science Review

            80(4):1187-1207.

 

True, James L., Bryan D. Jones, and Frank R. Baumgartner.  1999.  “Punctuated-

            Equilibrium Theory: Explaining Stability And Change in American

            Policymaking.”  In Theories of the Policy Process.  Ed. Paul A. Sabatier.

            Boulder, CO: Westview.  Pp. 97-116.)

 

Baumgartner, Frank R., and Bryan D. Jones. Eds.  2002.  Policy Dynamics.  Chicago:

            The University of Chicago Press.

 

Jones, Bryan D., Frank R. Baumgartner, and James L. True.  1998.  “Policy

            Punctuations: U.S. Budget Authority, 1947-1995."  Journal of Politics

            60(1):1-33.

 

Zahariadis, Nikolaos.  1999.  “Ambiguity, Time, and Multiple Streams.”  In Theories

            of the Policy Process.  Ed. Paul A. Sabatier.  Boulder, CO: Westview.  Pp. 73-96.

 

Supplemental Readings

Kingdon, John W.  1995.  Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies.  Boston: Little,

            Brown.

 

Baumgartner, Frank R., and Bryan D. Jones.  1993.  Agendas and Instability in

            American Politics.  Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

 

Baumgartner, Frank R., and Bryan D. Jones.  1991.  “Agenda Dynamics and Policy

            Subsystems.” Journal of Politics 53(4):1044-1074.

 

Mouw, Calvin J., and Michael B. Mackuen.  1992. “The Strategic Agenda in Legislative

            Politics.”  American Political Science Review 86(1):87-105.

 

Skocpol, Theda.  1992.  Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of

            Social Policy in the United States Cambridge: Belknap/Harvard University Press.

 

Snyder, James M., Jr.  1992.  “Gatekeeping or Not, Sample Selection in the Roll Call

            Agenda Matters.”  American Journal of Political Science 36(1):36-39.

 

Su, Tsai-Tsu, Mark S. Kamlet, and David C. Mowery.  1993. “Modeling U.S.

            Budgetary and Fiscal Policy Outcomes: A Disaggregated, Systemwide

            Perspective.”  American Journal of Political Science 37(1):213-245.

 

Skocpol, Theda, Christopher Howard, Susan Goodrich Lehmann, and Majorie

            Abend-Wein.  1993.  “Women’s Associations and the Enactment of Mothers’

            Pensions in the United States.”  American Political Science Review 87(3):

            686-99.

 

Sparks, Cheryl Logan, and Peter R. Walniuk.  1995.  “The Enactment of Mothers'

            Pensions: Civic Mobilization and Agenda Setting or Benefits of the Ballot?”

            American Political Science Review 89(3):710-720.

 

Skocpol, Theda.  1995.  “The Enactment of Mothers' Pensions: Civic Mobilization and

            Agenda Setting or Benefits of the Ballot?: Response.”  American Political

            Science Review 89(3):720-730.

 

Hays, Scott P., and Henry R. Glick.  1997.  “The Role of Agenda Setting in Policy

            Innovation: An Event History Analysis of Living-Will Laws.”  American

            Politics Quarterly 25(3):497-516.

 

Jones, Bryan D., James L. True, and Frank R. Baumgartner.  1997. “Does Incrementalism

            Stem From Political Consensus or From Institutional Gridlock?” American

            Journal of Political Science 41(4):

 

Bratton, Kathleen A., and Kerry L. Haynie.  1999.  “Agenda-Setting and Legislative

            Success in State Legislatures: The Effects of Gender and Race.” Journal of

            Politics 61(3):658-79.

 

Week 6: Perspectives on Policy Formulation and Adoption II: Issue Attention and Agenda Setting

 

Required Readings

Cohen, Jeffrey E. 1995.  “Presidential Rhetoric and the Public Agenda.”  American

            Journal of Political Science 39(1):87-107.

 

Adams, Greg D.  1997.  “Abortion: Evidence of an Issue Evolution.”  American

            Journal of Political Science 41(3): 718-37.

 

Flemming, Roy B., John Bohte, and B. Dan Wood. 1997.  “One Voice Among Many:

            The Supreme Court's Influence on Attentiveness to Issues in the United States,

            1947-1992.” American Journal of Political Science  41(4):1224-50.

 

Hill, Kim Quaile.  1998.  “The Policy Agendas of the President and the Mass Public:

            A Research Validation and Extension.” American Journal of Political Science

            42(4):1328-1334.

 

Edwards, George C., III, and B. Dan Wood. 1999.  “Who Influences Whom? The

            President and the Public Agenda.” American Political Science Review

            93(2):327-44.

 

Flemming, Roy B., B. Dan Wood, and John Bohte.  1999.  “Attention to Issues in a

            System of Separated Powers: The Macro-Dynamics of American Policy

            Agendas.”  Journal of Politics 61(1):76-108.

 

Supplemental Readings

Cobb, Roger W., & Charles D. Elder. 1983. Participation in American Politics: The

            Dynamics of Agenda-Building. 2nd ed. Baltimore and London: The Johns

            Hopkins University Press.

 

Carmines, Edward G., and James A. Stimson.  1989.  Issue Evolution: Race and the

            Transformation of American Politics.  Princeton: Princeton University Press.

 

Carmines, Edward G., and James A. Stimson.  1980. “The Two Faces of Issue Voting.”

            American Political Science Review 74(1):78-91.

 

Week 7: Comparative Public Policy in the American States

 

Required Reading

Berry, Frances Stokes, and William D. Berry.  1999.  “Innovation and Diffusion Models

            In Policy Research.”  In Theories of the Policy Process, ed. Paul E. Sabatier.

            Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

 

Blomquist, William.  1999.  “The Policy Process and Large-N Comparative Studies.”

            In Theories of the Policy Process, ed. Paul E. Sabatier.  Boulder, CO:

            Westview Press.

 

Hero, Rodney E., and Caroline J. Tolbert.  1996. “A Racial/Ethnic Diversity

            Interpretation of Politics and Policy in the States of the U.S.”  American

            Journal of Political Science 40(3):851-871.

 

Barrilleaux, Charles.  1997. “A Test of the Independent Influences of Electoral

            Competition and Party Strength in a Model of State Policymaking”

            American Journal of Political Science 41(4):1462-66

 

Fording, Richard C. 1997.  “The Conditional Effect of Violence as a Political Tactic:

            Mass Insurgency, Welfare Generosity, and Electoral Context in the American

            States.”  American Journal of Political Science 41(1):1-29.

 

Haider-Markel, Donald P., and Sean P. O’Brien. 1997.  “Creating a “Well Regulated

            Militia”: Policy Responses to Paramilitary Groups in the American States.”

            Political Research Quarterly 50(3):551-565.

 

Palley, Marian L.  1997.  “Presidential Address: The Intergovernmentalization of

            Health Care Reform: The Limits of the Devolution Revolution.” Journal

            of Politics 59(3):657-679.

 

Radcliff, Benjamin, and Martin Saiz.  1998.  “Labor Organization and Public Policy

            in the American States.”  Journal of Politics 60(1):

 

Hammons, Christopher W. 1999.  “Was James Madison Wrong? Rethinking the

            American Preference for Short, Framework-Oriented Constitutions.”

            American Political Science Review 93(4):837-850.

 

Supplemental Reading

Walker, Jack.  1969.  “The Diffusion of Innovations Among the American States.”

            American Political Science Review  68(3):880-99.

 

Gray, Virginia.  1973.  “Innovation in the States: A Diffusion Study.”  American

            Political Science Review  67(4):1174-85.

 

Savage, Robert L.  1978.  “Policy Innovativeness as a Trait of American States.”

            Journal of Politics  40(1):212-24.

 

Welch, Susan, and Kay Thompson.  1980. “The Impact of Federal Incentives on State

            Policy Innovation.”  American Journal of Political Science 24(4):715-729.

 

Hwang, Sung-Don, and Virginia Gray.  1991.  “External Limits and Internal

            Determinants of State Public Policy.”  Western Political Quarterly 44(1):277-99.

 

Berry, Frances. 1994.  “Sizing Up State Policy Innovation Research.”  Policy Studies

            Journal  22(3):442-56.

 

Berry, Frances, and William D. Berry. 1990.  “State Lottery Adoptions as Policy

            Innovations: An Event History Analysis.”  American Political Science Review

            84(2):395-415.

 

Glick, Henry R., and Scott P. Hays.  1991.  “Innovation and Reinvention in State

            Policymaking: Theory and the Evolution of Living Will Laws.”  Journal of

            Politics  53(4):835-50.

 

Berry, Frances, and William D. Berry. 1992.  “Tax Innovation in the States:

            Capitalizing on Political Opportunity.”  American Journal of Political Science

            36(3):715-42.

 

Erikson, Robert S., Gerald C. Wright, Jr., and John P. McIver.  1993.  Statehouse

            Democracy.  Boston: Cambridge University Press.

 

Glick, Henry R.  1994.  The Right to Die: Policy Innovation and Its Consequences. New

            York: Columbia University Press.

 

Hays, Scott P.  1996.  “Patterns of Reinvention: The Nature of Evolution During

            Policy Diffusion.”  Policy Studies Journal  24:551-66.

 

Mintrom, Michael.  1997.  “Policy Entrepreneurs and the Diffusion of Innovation.”

            American Journal of Political Science  41(3): 738-70.

 

Berry, William D., Evan J. Ringquist, Richard C. Fording, and Russell L. Hanson. 1998.

            “Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the American States, 1960-93.”

            American Journal of Political Science 42(1):327-348.

 

Week 8: Comparative Public Policy Across Countries

 

Required Reading

Klingmann, Hans-Dieter, Richard I. Hofferbert, and Ian Budge.  1994.  Parties, Policies

            And Democracy.  Boulder: Westview Press.

 

Morrow, James D., Randolph M. Siverson, and Tressa E. Taberes 1998. “The Political

            Determinants of International Trade: The Major Powers, 1907–90.” American

            Political Science Review 92(3):649-61

 

Morrow, James D., Randolph M. Siverson, and Tressa E. Taberes 1998. “Correction

            to “The Political Determinants of International Trade.”  American Political

            Science Review 93(4): 931-934.

 

Brown, David S., and Wendy Hunter.  1999.  “Democracy and Social Spending in Latin

            America, 1980–92.”  American Political Science Review 93(4):779-790.

 

Reich, Gary M.  1999.  “Coordinating Restrain: Democratization, Fiscal Policy, and

            Money Creation in Latin America.”  Political Research Quarterly 52(4):729-52.

 

Thérien, Jean-Philippe, and Alain Noël. 2000.  “Political Parties and Foreign Aid.”

            American Political Science Review 94(1):151-62.

 

Supplemental Readings

Shull, Steven, and Jeffrey Cohen. Eds. 1986.  Economics and Politics of Industrial

            Policy: The United States and Western Europe.  Boulder: Westview Press.

 

Heclo, Hugh, Carolyn Teich Adams, and Arnold J. Heidenheimer.  1990.  3rd ed.

            Comparative Public Policy: The Politics of Social Choice in Europe and

            America.  Bedford Books.

 

Hilz, C., and J. Ehrenfeld, 1991. “Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes: A

            Comparative Analysis of Policy Options to Control the International Waste

            Trade.” International Environmental Affairs 3 (Winter):26-63.

 

Harrop, M. Ed.  1992. Power and Policy in Liberal Democracies.  Cambridge:

            Cambridge University Press.

 

Asmerom, H. K.,  and R. B. Jain.  1993.  Politics, Administration, and Public Policy

            In Developing Countries: Examples From America, Asia, and Latin America.

            Amsterdam: VU University Press.

 

Weaver, R. Kent, and Bert Rockman. Eds. 1993.  Do Institutions Matter?  Government

            Capabilities in the United States and Abroad.  Washington, DC: The Brookings

            Institute.

 

Janoski, Thomas, and Alexander Hicks.  1994.  The Comparative Political Economy

            of The Welfare State.  Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

 

Adger, W. Neil, Davide Pettenella, and Martin Whitby. eds. 1997.  Climate-Change

            Mitigation and European Land-Use Policies.  New York: Oxford University

            Press.

 

Castles, Francis G.  1998. Comparative Public Policy: Patterns of post-war

            Transformation. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishers.

 

Mansfield, Edward.  1998.  “The Proliferation of Preferential Trading Agreements.”

            Journal of Conflict Resolution 42,5

 

Week 9: Public Expenditures and Distributional Issues

 

Required Reading

Tompkins, Gary L.  1975.  “A Causal Model of State Welfare Expenditures.” Journal

            of Politics 37(2):392-416.

 

Dye, Thomas R.  1980.  “Taxing, Spending, and Economic Growth in the American

            States.”  Journal of Politics 42(4):1085-1107.

 

Barrilleaux, Charles J., and Mark E. Miller.  1988. “The Political Economy of State

            Medicaid Policy.”  American Political Science Review 82(4):1089-1107.

 

Lee, Frances E.  1998.  “Representation and Public Policy: The Consequences of Senate

            Apportionment for the Geographic Distribution of Federal Funds.” Journal of

            Politics 60(1):34-62.

 

Stream, Christopher.  1999.  “Health Reform in the States: A Model of State Small

            Group Health Insurance Market Reforms.”  Political Research Quarterly 52(3):

            499-526.

 

Soss, Joe, Sanford R. Schram, Thomas P. Vartanian, and Erin O’Brien.  2001.  “Setting

            The Terms of Relief: Explaining State Policy Choices in the Devolution

            Revolution.”  American Journal of Political Science 45(2):378-395.

 

Supplemental Readings

Brace, Paul.  1993.  State Government & Economic Performance.  Baltimore: John

            Hopkins University Press.

 

Coleman, John J. 1999.  “Unified Government, Divided Government, and Party

            Responsiveness.” American Political Science Review 93(4):821-836.

 

Lieberman, Robert, and Greg Shaw.  2000. “Looking Inward, Looking Outward: The

            Politics of State Welfare Innovation Under Devolution.” Political Research

            Quarterly 53(2):215-240.

 

Rosenau, Pauline Vaillancourt.  Ed.  2000.  Public-Private Policy Partnerships.

            Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

 

Savas, E. S. 2000.  Privatization and Public-Private Partnerships.  New York:

            Seven Bridges Press, LLC.

 

Week 10:

 

No Class, Spring Break March 17-23

 

Week 11: National Security and Foreign Policy

Required Reading

Volgy, Thomas J., and John E. Schwarz.  1991. “Does Politics Stop at the Water’s

            Edge? Domestic Political Factors and Foreign Policy Restructuring in the

            Cases of Great Britain, France, and West Germany.”  Journal of Politics

            53(3):615-643.

 

Hartley, Thomas and Bruce Russett.  1992.  “Public Opinion and the Common Defense:

            Who Governs Military Spending in the United States?” American Political

            Science Review 86(4):905-915.

 

Holland, Lauren.  1996.  “Who Makes Weapons Procurement Decisions?  A Test of the

            Subsystem of Policymaking.”  Policy Studies Journal 24(4):607-28.

 

Meernik, James, Eric L. Krueger, and Steven C. Poe.  1998.  “Testing Models of

            United States Foreign Policy: Foreign Aid During and After the Cold War.”

            Journal of Politics  60(1):

 

Wood, B. Dan, and Jeffrey S. Peake.  1998.  “The Dynamics of Foreign Policy Agenda

            Setting.” American Political Science Review 92(1):173-84.

 

Kydd, Andrew.  2000.  “Arms Races and Arms Control: Modeling the Hawk

            Perspective.”  American Journal of Political Science 44(2):228-44.

 

Cronin, Patrick, and Benjamin O. Fordham.  1999.  “Timeless Principles or Today's

            Fashion? Testing the Stability of the Linkage between Ideology and Foreign

            Policy in the Senate.”  Journal of Politics 61(4):967-998.

 

Carsey, Thomas M., and Barry Rundquist.  1999. “Party and Committee in Distributive

            Politics: Evidence from Defense Spending.”  Journal of Politics 61(4):1156-69.

 

Supplemental Reading

 

Art, Robert J. and Kenneth Waltz (ed.). 1999. The Use of Force: Military Power and

            International Politics. 5th Edition. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

 

Jordan, Amos, William Taylor, and Michael Mazarr. 1999. American National Security.

            5th Edition. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins.

 

Kampfer, William H. and Anton Lowenberg. 1999.  “Unilateral versus Multilateral

            International Sanctions: A Public Choice Perspective.”  International Studies

            Quarterly 43, 1

 

Haass, Richard. 1998. Intervention. Washington: The Brookings Institution.

 

Hillen, John. 1998. Future Visions for U.S. Defense Policy. New York: Council on

            Foreign Relations. (Also available on-line at:

            http://www.foreignrelations.org/public/pubs/speeches.html.

 

John L. Davies and Ted Robert Gurr. 1998.  Preventive Measures: Building Risk

            Assessment and Crisis Early Warning Models.  Rowman and Littlefield.

 

Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, James D. Morrow, Randolph M. Siverson, and Alastair

            Smith.  1999.  “An Institutional Explanation of the Democratic Peace.”

            American Political Science Review 93(4):791-808.

 

Week 12: Morality Policy

 

1999 Symposium in Policy Studies Journal 27(4):, Which includes the following articles:

 

            Mooney, Introduction, pp. 675-680.

            Meier, Drugs, pp. 681-695

            Pierce, Patrick A., and Donald E. Miller.  Lottery. Pp. 696-706

            Norrander and Wilcox.  Abortion. Pp. 707-722

            Smith.  Porn.  Pp. 723-734.

 

Mooney, Christopher Z. 2000. “The Decline of Federalism and the Rise of

            Morality-Policy Conflict in the United States.” Publius (Wntr-Spring): 171-188.

 

Mooney, Christopher Z., and Mei-Hsien Lee.  2000.  “The Influence of Values on

            Consensus and the Contentious Morality Policy: U.S. Death Penalty Reform,

            1956-1982.”  Journal of Politics 62(1):223-39.

 

Supplemental Reading

Meier, Kenneth J.  1994.  The Politics of Sin: Drugs, Alcohol and Public Policy. 

            Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.

 

Mooney, Christopher Z., and Mei-Hsien Lee.  1995.  “Legislating Morality in the

            American States: The Case of Pre-Roe Abortion Regulation Reform.”

            American Journal of Political Science 39(3):599-627.

 

Haider-Markel, Donald P., and Kenneth J. Meier.  1996.  “The Politics of Gay and

            Lesbian Rights: Expanding the Scope of the Conflict.”  Journal of Politics 

            58(2):332-49.

 

Clark, Nina.  1997.  The Politics of Physician Assisted Suicide.  New York: Garland

            Publishing.

 

Tatalovich, Raymond and Byron W. Daynes.  eds.  1998. 2nd ed. Moral Controversies in

            American Politics: Cases in Social Regulatory Policy.  Armonk, NY: M. E.

            Sharpe.

 

Glick, Henry R., and Amy Hutchinson.  1999.  “The Rising Tide of Physician Assisted

            Suicide: Explaining the Growth and Content of Morality Policy.”  Policy Studies

            Journal 27(4):750-65.

 

Haider-Markel, Donald P.  1999.  “Morality Policy and Individual-Level Political

             Behavior: The Case of Legislative Voting on Lesbian and Gay Issues.”  Policy

            Studies Journal 27(4):735-49.

 

Norton, Noelle H.  1999.  “Committee Influence Over Controversial Policy: The

            Reproductive Policy Case.”  Policy Studies Journal 27(2):203-16.

 

Joslyn, Mark, and Donald P. Haider-Markel.  2002.  “Examining Framing Effects on

            Personal Opinion and Perception of Public Opinion: The Cases of

            Physician-Assisted Suicide and Social Security.”  Social Science Quarterly

            83(3):690-706.

 

Lindamen, Kara, and Donald P. Haider-Markel.  2002.  “Issue Evolution, Political

            Parties, and the Culture Wars.” Political Research Quarterly 55(1):91-110.

 

Week 13: Environmental Policy

 

Required Reading

Williams, Bruce A. and Albert R. Matheny.  1984.  “Testing Theories of

            Social Regulation: Hazardous Waste Regulation in the American States.”

            Journal of Politics 46(2):428-458.

 

Taggart, William A. 1985. “Air Quality Control Expenditures in the American States.”

            Journal of Politics 47(2):704-714.

 

Ringquist, Evan J.  1993.  Environmental Protection at the State Level.  Armonk, NY:

            M. E. Sharpe.

 

Hedge, David M., and Michael J. Scicchitano.  1994. “Regulating in Space and Time:

            The Case of Regulatory Federalism” The Journal of Politics 56(1):134-153.

 

Supplemental Reading

Carson, R. 1962. Silent Spring. New York: Fawcett Crest.

 

Riddlesperger, James W. Jr. and James D. King. 1982.  “Energy Votes in

            the U.S. Senate, 1973-1980.” Journal of Politics 44(3):838-847.

 

Kraft, Michael E., and Norman J. Vig.  1984. “Environmental Policy in the

            Reagan Presidency.” Political Science Quarterly 99(3):415-439.

 

Rothman, Stanley and S. Robert Lichter. 1987.  “Elite Ideology and Risk

            Perception in Nuclear Energy Policy.” American Political Science Review

            81(2):383-404.

 

Fowler, Linda L. and Ronald G. Shaiko.  1987. “The Grass Roots Connection:

            Environmental Activists and Senate Roll Calls.” American Journal of Political

            Science. 31(3):484-510.

 

Ostrom, Elinor. 1990.  Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for

            Collective Action.  Boston: Cambridge University Press.

 

Green, Donald Philip.  1992. “The Price Elasticity of Mass Preferences.” American

            Political Science Review 86(1):128-148.

 

Ophuls, William, and A. Stephan Boyan. 1992.  Ecology and the Politics of Scarcity

            Revisited.  New York: W. H.  Freeman.

 

Cawley, R. McGreggor. 1993.  Federal Land, Western Anger: The Sagebrush

            Rebellion and Environmental Politics. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas.

 

Kamieniecki, Sheldon, ed. 1993.  Environmental Politics in the International Arena.

            Albany: SUNY Press.

 

Myers, Norman. 1993.  Ultimate Security: The Environmental Basis of Political Stability.

            New York: W.W. Norton.

 

Bullard, Robert D. 1994. Dumping in Dixie: Race, Class and Environmental Quality.

            2nd ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, Inc.

 

Rabe, Barry. 1994.  Beyond Nimby: Hazardous Waste Siting in Canada and the United

            States.  Washington, DC: Brookings.

 

Landy, Marc, Marc Roberts, and Stephen Thomas. 1995.  The Environmental Protection

            Agency: Asking the Wrong Questions, 2nd edition.  New York: Oxford.

 

Lester, James, ed. 1995.  Environmental Politics and Policy: Theories and Evidence,

            2nd ed.  Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

 

Davies, J. Clarence. 1996.  Comparing Environmental Risks: Tools for Setting

            Government Priorities.  Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.

 

Dixon, Lloyd, Steven Garver, and Mary Vaiana. 1996.  California’s Ozone-Reduction

            Strategy for Light-Duty Vehicles: An Economic Assessment.  Santa Monica, CA:

            Rand.

 

Eckstein, Rick.  1996.  Nuclear Power and Social Power.  Philadelphia: Temple

            University Press.

 

Kraft, Michael. 1996.  Environmental Policy and Politics.  New York: Harper Collins.

 

Adger, W. Neil, Davide Pettenella, and Martin Whitby. eds. 1997.  Climate-Change

            Mitigation and European Land-Use Policies.  New York: Oxford University

            Press.

 

Peretz, Jean H., Robert A. Bohm, and Philip D. Jasienczyk. 1997.  “Environmental

            Policy and the reduction of hazardous waste.” Journal of Policy Analysis &

            Management 16(4):556-575.

 

Helland, Eric.  1998.  “Environmental Protection in The Federalist System: The

            Political Economy of NPDES inspections.” Economic Inquiry 36(2):305-320.

 

Andrews, Richard N. L.  1999. Managing the Environment, Managing Ourselves: A

            History of American Environmental Policy.  New Haven, CT: Yale University

            Press.

 

Flemming, Roy B., B. Dan Wood, and John Bohte.  1999.  “Attention to Issues in a

            System of Separated Powers: The Macro-Dynamics of American Policy

            Agendas.”  Journal of Politics 61(1):76-108.

 

Rabe, Barry G.  2000.  “Power to the States: The Promise and Pitfalls of

            Decentralization.”  In Environmental Policy, 4th ed. eds. Norman J. Vig and

            Michael E. Kraft.  Washington, DC: CQ Press.

 

1999. Readings from “Symposium: Comparative Analyses of Canadian and American

            Environmental Policy.”  Policy Studies Journal 27(2):263-392.

 

Vig, Norman, and Michael Kraft. 2000.  Environmental Policy in the 1990s, 4th ed.

            Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.

 

Week 14: Criminal Justice Policy

 

Required Reading

Caldeira, Greg A., and Andrew T. Cowart.  1980. “Budgets, Institutions, and Change:

            Criminal Justice Policy in America.”  American Journal of Political Science

            24(3): 413-438.

 

Gibson, James L. 1989. “The Policy Consequences of Political Intolerance: Political

            Repression During the Vietnam War Era.”  Journal of Politics 51(1):13-35.

 

Saltzstein, Grace Hall.  1989.  “Black Mayors and Police Policies.”  Journal of Politics

            51(3):525-544.

 

Meier, Kenneth J.  1992.  “The Politics of Drug Abuse: Laws, Implementation, and

            Consequences.”  The Western Political Quarterly  45:41-69.

 

Nice, David C. 1992.  “The States and the Death Penalty.”  Western Political

            Quarterly  45:1037-1048.

 

Durant, Robert F., and Jerome S. Legge, Jr.  1993.  “Policy Design, Social Regulation,

            and Theory Building: Lessons from the Traffic Safety Policy Arena.”  Political

            Research Quarterly  46:641-656.

 

Haider-Markel, Donald P. 1998.  “The Politics of Social Regulatory Policy: State and

            Federal Hate Crime Policy and Implementation Effort.”  Political Research

            Quarterly 51(1):69-88.

 

Supplemental Reading

Gray, Virginia, and Bruce Williams.  1980.  The Organizational Politics of

     Criminal Justice.  Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

 

Welch, Susan, and Kay Thompson.  1980. “The Impact of Federal Incentives on State

            Policy Innovation.”  American Journal of Political Science 24(4):715-729.

 

Miller, Peter V., and Robert M. Groves.  1985. “Matching Survey Responses to Official

            Records: An Exploration of Validity in Victimization Reporting.”  Public

            Opinion Quarterly 49(3):366-380.

 

Protess, David L., Donna R. Leff, Stephen C. Brooks, and Margaret T. Gordon. 1985.

            “Uncovering Rape: The Watchdog Press and the Limits of Agenda Setting.”

            Public Opinion Quarterly 49(1):19-37.

 

Green, Donald Philip, and Ann Elizabeth Gerken.  1989. “Self-Interest and Public

            Opinion Toward Smoking Restrictions and Cigarette Taxes.”  Public Opinion

            Quarterly 53(1):1-16.

 

Meier, Kenneth J., and Cathy Johnson.  1990.  “The Politics of Demon Rum: Regulating

            Alcohol and its Deleterious Consequences.”  American Politics Quarterly 18:

            404-429.

 

Skogan, Wesley.  1990.  “Crime and Punishment.”  In Politics in the American States,

            5th ed.  eds. Virginia Gray, Herbert Jacob, and Robert Albritton.  Glenview, IL:

            Scott, Foresman/Little, Brown.

 

Meier, Kenneth J., and Thomas M. Holbrook.  1992. “‘I Seen My Opportunities and I

            Took Em’: Political Corruption in the American States.”  Journal of Politics

            54(1):135-155.

 

Meier, Kenneth J.  1994.  The Politics of Sin: Drugs, Alcohol, and Public Policy.

            Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, Inc.

 

Kathlene, Lyn.  1995. “Alternative Views of Crime: Legislative Policymaking in

            Gendered Terms.”  Journal of Politics 57(3):696-723.

 

Hurwitz, Jon, and Mark Peffley.  1997. “Public Perceptions of Race and Crime: The

            Role of Racial Stereotypes.” American Journal of Political Science

            41(2):375-401.

 

Week 15: Education Policy

 

Required Reading

 

Fraga, Luis Ricardo, Kenneth J. Meier, and Robert E. England.  1986.  “Hispanic

            Americans and Educational Policy: Limits to Equal Access.”  Journal of Politics

            48(4):850-876.

 

Chubb, John E., and Terry M. Moe.  1988.  “Politics, Markets, and the Organization of

            Schools.”  American Political Science Review 82(4):1065-1087.

 

Tweedie, Jack, Dennis D. Riley, John E. Chubb, and Terry M. Moe.  1990.  “Should

            Market Forces Control Educational Decision Making?” American Political

            Science Review 84(2):549-567.

 

Smith, Kevin B.  1994.  “Policy, Markets, and Bureaucracy: Reexamining School

            Choice.”  Journal of Politics  56:475-91.

 

Schneider, Mark, Paul Teske, Christine Roch, and Melissa Marschall. 1997.  “Networks

            to Nowhere: Segregation and Stratification in Networks of Information about

            Schools.”  American Journal of Political Science 41(4):1201-1223.

 

Hokenmaier, Karl G.  1998. “Social Security vs. Educational Opportunity in Advanced

            Industrial Societies: Is There a Trade-Off?” American Journal of Political Science

            42(2):709-711.

 

Mintrom, Michael, and Sandra Vergari.  1998.  “Policy Networks and Innovation

            Diffusion: The Case of State Education Reforms.”  Journal of Politics

            60(1):126-48.

 

Supplemental Reading

Stephens, David.  1983-84. “President Carter, the Congress, and NEA: Creating the

            Department of Education.”  Political Science Quarterly 98(4):641-663.

 

Anderson, Barbara A., and Brian D. Silver.  1984. “Equality, Efficiency, and Politics

            in Soviet Bilingual Education Policy, 1934-1980.”  American Political

            Science Review 78(4):1019-1039.

 

Meier, Kenneth J.  1984.  “Teachers, Students, and Discrimination: The Policy Impact

            of Black Representation.”  Journal of Politics 46(1):252-263.

 

Meier, Kenneth J., Robert E. England.  1984.  “Black Representation and Educational

            Policy: Are They Related?” American Political Science Review 78(2):392-403.

 

Meier, Kenneth J, Joseph Stewart, Jr., and Robert E. England. 1989. Race, Class, and

            Education: The Politics of Second-Generation Discrimination.  Madison:

            University of Wisconsin Press.

 

Stewart, Joseph, Jr., Robert E. England, and Kenneth J. Meier.  1989.  “Black

            Representation in Urban School Districts: From School Board to Office to

            Classroom.”  Western Political Quarterly 42(2):287-305.

 

Chubb, John E., and Terry M. Moe.  1990.  Politics, Markets, and America’s Schools.

            Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

 

Lowery, David, W. E. Lyons, and Ruth Hoogland DeHoog.  1995. “The Empirical

            Evidence for Citizen Information and a Local Market for Public Goods.”

            American Political Science Review 89(3):705-707.

 

Smith, Kevin B., and Kenneth J. Meier.  1995.  The Case Against School Choice:

            Politics, Markets, and Fools.

 

Mintrom, Michael, and Sandra Vergari.  1996.  “Advocacy Coalitions, Policy

            Entrepreneurs, and Policy Change.”  Policy Studies Journal 24(3):420-34.

 

Mintrom, Michael.  1997.  “Policy Entrepreneurs and the Diffusion of Innovation.”

            American Journal of Political Science  41(3): 738-70.

 

Schneider, Mark, Paul Teske, Melissa Marshall, and Christine Roch.  1998. “Shopping

            for Schools: In the Land of the Blind, The One-Eyed Parent May be Enough.”

            American Journal of Political Science 42(3):769-793.

 

 

Week 16: Research Presentations, May 1

 

Week 17: Research Presentations, May 8

 

 

Research Paper Due May 14, 4p.m. in 405 Blake Hall

 

 

 

Extra Week for Reaction Papers: Policy Issues Across Institutional Venues and Arenas

 

Required Reading

Gross, Donald A. 1980. “House-Senate Conference Committees: A Comparative-State

            Perspective.”  American Journal of Political Science 24(4):769-778.

 

Bendor, Jonathan, and Terry M. Moe. 1986. “Agenda Control, Committee Capture and

            the Dynamics of Institutional Politics.” American Political Science Review

            80(4):1187-1207.

 

King, David C.  1994. “The Nature of Congressional Committee Jurisdictions.”

            American Political Science Review 88(1):48-62.

 

Talbert, Jeffery C., Bryan D. Jones, and Frank R. Baumgartner.  1995.  “Nonlegislative

            Hearings and Policy Change in Congress.”  American Journal of Political

            Science 39(2):383-405.

 

Pelissero, John P., and Timothy B. Krebs.  1997. “City Council Legislative Committees

            and Policy-making in Large United States Cities.”  American Journal of Political

            Science 41(2):499-518.

 

Donovan, Todd and Shaun Bowler. 1998.  “Direct Democracy and Minority Rights: An

            Extension.”  American Journal of Political Science 42(3):1020-1024.

 

Camobreco, John F. 1998.  “Preferences, Fiscal Policies, and the Initiative Process.”

            Journal of Politics  60(3):819-829.

 

Joslyn, Mark R., and Donald P. Haider-Markel.  2000.  “Guns in the Ballot Box:

            Information, Groups, and Opinion in Ballot Initiative Campaigns.” American

            Politics Quarterly 28(3):355-78.

 

Supplemental Reading

McDonagh, Eileen Lorenzi.  1992. “Representative Democracy and State Building in the

            Progressive Era.”  American Political Science Review 86(4):938-950.

 

Hogan, J. Michael, and Ted J. Smith III.  1991. “Polling on the Issues: Public Opinion

            and the Nuclear Freeze.”  Public Opinion Quarterly 55(4):534-569.

 

Jones, Bryan D., Frank R. Baumgartner, and Jeffery C. Talbert.  1993. “The Destruction

            of Issue Monopolies in Congress.”  American Political Science Review

            87(3):657-671.

 

Donovan, Todd, and Joseph R. Snipp.  1994. “Support for Legislative Term Limitations

            in California: Group Representation, Partisanship, and Campaign Information.”

            Journal of Politics 56(2):492-501.

 

Gerber, Elisabeth R.  1996.  “Legislative Response to the Threat of Popular

            Initiatives.”  American Journal of Political Science  40(1):99-128.

 

Lascher, Jr., Edward L., Michael G. Hagen, and Steven A. Rochlin.  1996.  “Gun

            Behind the Door?: Ballot Initiatives, State Policies, and Public Opinion.”

            Journal of Politics  58:760-75.

 

Tolbert, Caroline J., and Rodney E. Hero.  1996.   “Race/Ethnicity and Direct

            Democracy: An Analysis of California's Illegal Immigration Initiative.”  Journal

            of Politics 58(3):806-818.

 

Gamble, Barbara S.  1997.  “Putting Civil Rights to a Popular Vote.”  American

            Journal of Political Science  41(1):245-269.

 

Kollman, Ken.  1997. “Inviting Friends to Lobby: Interest Groups, Ideological Bias, and

            Congressional Committees.” American Journal of Political Science 41(2):519-44.

 

Frey, Bruno S., and Lorenz Goette.  1998. “Does the Popular Vote Destroy Civil Rights?”

            American Journal of Political Science 42(4):1343-1348.

 

Haider-Markel, Donald P., and Kenneth J. Meier. 2001.  “Legislative Victory, Electoral

            Uncertainty: Explaining Outcomes in the Battles over Lesbian and Gay Civil

            Rights.”  Policy Studies Review