Whenever any foreign substance or agent enters our body, the immune
system is activated. Both B- and T-cell members respond to the threat,
which eventually results in the elimination of the substance or agent
from our bodies. If the agent which gains entry is the kind which
remains outside of our cells all of the time (extracellular pathogen), or
much of the time (virus often released) the
"best" response is the production by B-cells of antibodies which
circulate all around the body in the bloodstream, and eventually bind to
the agent. There are mechanisms available which are very
good at destroying anything which has an antibody bound to it. On the
other hand, if the agent is one which goes
inside one of our cells and remains there most of the time (intracellular
pathogens like viruses or certain
bacteria which require the inside of one of our cells in order to live),
the "best" response is the activation of cytotoxic
T-cells (circulate in the bloodstream and lymph), which eliminate the agent
through killing of the cell which
contains the agent (agent is otherwise "hidden"). Both of
these kinds of responses (B-cell or cytotoxic T-cell) of course require
specific helper T-cell biochemical information as described above. Usually,
both B-cell and cytotoxic T-cell responses occur against intracellular
agents which provides a two-pronged attack. Normally, these actions are
wonderfully protective of
us. The effect of HIV on the immune system is the result of a gradual
(usually) elimination of the Th1 and Th2 helper T-cell sub-populations.
The fight between the virus and the immune system for supremacy is
continuous. Our
body responds to this onslaught through production of more T-cells, some
of which mature to become helper T-cells. The virus eventually infects
these targets and eliminates them, too. More T-cells are produced;
these too become infected, and are killed by the virus. This fight may
continue for up to ten years before the body eventually succumbs, apparently
because of the inability to any-longer produce T-cells. This loss of helper
T-cells finally results in
the complete inability of our body to ward-off even the weakest of
organisms (all kinds of bacteria and viruses other than HIV) which are
normally not ever a problem to us. This acquired condition of immunodeficiency
is called, AIDS.
Our immune system's ability to recognize any foreign substance or agent, depends entirely upon how the substance or agent "looks" with respect to the molecular shapes displayed - just as your elbow looks different than someone else's elbow - even though each are clearly elbows. Therefore, while an individual may become infected with a single strain of HIV, over several years of many, many viral generations, an individual may have 10 different strains of HIV present. Further, to date no two people have been identified to have been infected with the same strain of HIV. Consequently, against which strain should a population be immunized? In such cases, one tries to identify molecular shapes which are common to all known strains - in this way, all strains would theoretically be recognizable by our immune system. Sadly, this research has failed to provide an effective vaccine. This virus is subtle, and can do some very covert things using biochemical mechanisms we do not yet understand. Because of recent basic research in the field of immunology (the discipline which develops an understanding of the intricate workings of the immune system), based upon years of previous basic research in this and other fields however, some light is beginning to emerge which may help us.
It is becoming clear that the two helper T-cell types identified only a
few years ago
may be significantly more important than first assumed. Remember, the
Th1 helper-cell helps generate a cytotoxic T-cell response, and the Th2
helper-cell helps generate an antibody response. As it turns out, certain
intracellular pathogens primarily elicit a Th2 response in certain in-bred
strains
of mice, while in a different in-bred mouse strain, the same pathogen
primarily elicits a Th1 response. In this example, all mice which
respond primarily with antibody (B-cell; Th2 help), die; and, all
mice which primarily respond with a cytotoxic T-cell response (Th1 help),
live! Such is not the case for every intracellular pathogen - some
responses are very balanced with respect to B-cell and cytotoxic T-cell
contributions, and others are imbalanced in one or the other direction.
The balance in contribution of these two paths to an immune response,
appears to not only depend upon
the particular infectious organism, but also upon the particular genetic
background of the infected animal. Thus, one can imagine that one may be
able to find a way to tip the balance towards the most effective
response path against a given organism, e.g., either antibody production by
B-cells, or development of cytotoxic T-cells. This research is one of
the prime areas under investigation with regard to HIV. There are very
limited data to date; but, those individuals who have had HIV for a
really long time, but
have not yet acquired AIDS (there are indeed now a number of such
individuals),
appear to have their immune response shifted towards the cytotoxic side
(Th1 help). This limited information on HIV, in combination with
basic research information on several different diseases using animal models
(mice), has
generated a quick response within the research community. Consequently,
there are efforts currently underway to identify
the biochemical substances which are involved in directing a response
along the Th1 path, and efforts to determine how the immune system might
be manipulated to direct a response along a given path. Such
experimentation is long and difficult, and requires money, skill,
unflinching commitment, and an abiding faith that this problem can be
solved.
Under normal circumstances, the design of the immune system's various tissues and connections, allows the agent to be focused within a regional lymph node, which greatly improves the probability of an effective defensive response. In the case of HIV, however, this ability either brings the target cells to the virus, or brings the virus to the target cells. Consequently, the only way to prevent exposure to the virus, is to avoid situations which allow the potential for entry of the virus. Such situations are overwhelmingly associated with sexual intercourse, intravenous drug use, and exposure of a cut in one's skin to the bodily fluids (secretions, blood) of an HIV-infected individual. Such situations do not include hugging, touching, or other nonfluid-exchange expressions of caring for someone infected with HIV.
Oral, vaginal, and anal intercourse can lead to tiny abrasions of the mucosal tissue in these areas; and, within the tissues of the mouth (gums in particular) there will almost always be tiny abrasions present under any circumstances. These openings provide access by the virus to the blood and lymphatic streams, as well as to cells within the tissue. If a person is infected with HIV, there will be virus within the secretions of the person (particularly the seminal fluid of males), and in the blood of the person. Consequently, the direct exposure to bodily fluids (secretions, blood) can potentially occur between both partners (female/female, male/male, female/male) during any kind of sexual intercourse, whether or not ejaculation by a male partner occurs. While the body may be able to ward-off a small amount of virus, repeated exposure to such amounts places a person, particularly women having vaginal intercourse, and men and women having anal intercourse with an HIV-infected partner, at significant risk of HIV infection. Under any circumstance, there is a risk of HIV infection through only one sexual intercourse encounter. The use of a condom for the male partner, in combination with chemical substances which kill viruses, is recommended. Multiple sexual partners, unprotected sexual intercourse, anal sexual intercourse, the presence of other sexually-transmitted disease, and intravenous drug usage significantly increase the risk of HIV infection.
One can be tested for the presence of HIV through an appointment with one's local Health Department (state-supported). Health department test results are completely confidential and inaccesible to anyone but the patient and testing physician at the public-health clinic. While a personal physician's records are also confidential, these records are however, subject to examination at any time by the health insurer(s) of the physician. No matter where one chooses to be examined, one will be required to undergo a pre-test and post-test psychological counseling session.
Recent Statistics (January, 1995): The CDC report showed 401,749 cases
of AIDS in the U.S. through the middle of 1994, while approximately
one-million within the U.S. are infected with HIV. Twenty percent of
all AIDS cases within the U.S. are within the 20s age-group - (apparently
contracted HIV while teenagers).
The CDC AIDS Hotlines are:
English: 800-342-2437 (800-342-AIDS)
Spanish: 800-344-7432 (800-344-SIDA)
Deaf: 800-243-7889.
Your local Health Department is also a good source of information.
Become informed.