Qualitative Data Analysis
Coms 930, Fall 2011

 

Instructor: Dr. Nancy Baym

Communication Studies

University of Kansas

 

 

Course Overview and Goals

This class will:

Expose you to a variety of ways of getting from a body of collected qualitative data to a compelling analysis of that data

Provide hands on experience analyzing data

Provide a structured environment to get from qualitative data you have collected into a publishable paper

Provide collaborative opportunities to participate in and critique one anotherÕs work.

Required Readings

 

Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

 

See course schedule for additional readings.

 

Assignments

10 workshop days (40%) You should do the 2-3 workshops that will take place on Blackboard instead of in class. Of the 7-8 workshop days that meet in class, you should prepare materials for at least four (we will sign up in advance). As part of workshopping, you will also be expected to provide meaningful peer review.

Final Paper (55%) At the end of the semester you should have a qualitative research paper that is ready to submit to a major conference or for journal review.

Presentation (5%) You will make a 12 minute presentation of your final paper to the class as though it were a conference.
Course Schedule

 

Monday August 22: First meeting

 

Introduction to Data Analysis

 

Wednesday August 24

Taylor, S. J. & Bogdan, R. (1984). ÒWorking with dataÓ In Introduction to qualitative research methods.  123-145, John Wiley & Sons.

 

Atkinson, P. & Delamont, S. (2008) Analytic perspectives. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln, Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials, 285-311.3rd Edition.

 

Monday August 29

Hammersley and Atkinson (1983), Chapter 8 ÒThe Process of AnalysisÓ in Ethnography. 2nd Ed. Routledge.

 

Wednesday August 31: No in-class meeting.

Workshop Day 1: Post to Blackboard: In 1-3 pages tell us your topic, the literature background on which your project is likely to draw, and the general approach you plan to use to analyzing your data. What data (if any) do you have that you are ready to analyze in this class? What kind of materials are they? How much of them are there? What kinds of questions are you interested in asking about them?

Read each otherÕs posts and respond with what, if anything, you feel you could bring to a project like that.

Form preliminary teams of 3-5 people with interests similar to one another and a variety of kinds of data. These are the people who will be responsible for giving one another constructive critiques on workshops and reading responses.

 

Monday September 5: NO CLASS - LABOR DAY

Assessing Analyses

 

Wednesday September 7

Hammersley (1998). Standards for Assessing Ethnographic ResearchÓ and ÒMaking an assessment: Validity,Ó Chapter 3 in Reading Ethnographic Research, Second Edition, London: Longman.

 

Silverman, D. (1989). "Rules of Qualitative Research." Symbolic Interaction, 12(2), 215-230.

 

Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight Òbig-tentÓ criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16:10.

 

Grounded Theory

 

Monday September 12

Charmaz, K. ÒAn Invitation to Grounded TheoryÓ and ÒGathering Rich DataÓ in Constructing Grounded Theory. Sage

 

Suddaby, R. (2006). From the editors: What grounded theory is not. The Academy of Management Journal, 49, 633-642.

 

Wednesday September 14

Basu, A. & Dutta, M. J. (2009) Sex workers and HIV/AIDS: Analyzing participatory culture-centered health communication strategies. Human Communication Research 35 (2009) 86–114

 

Monday September 19

Workshop Day 2: Bring to class a 1 page written summary of at least three ideas that are emerging from your data along with 2-3 concrete examples.

Thematic analysis

Wednesday September 21

Owen, W. F. (1984). Interpretive themes in relational communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech 70, 274-287.

Meisenback, R. J. (2010). The female breadwinner: Phenomenological experience and gendered identity in work/family spaces. Sex Roles, 62, 2-19..

 

Monday September 26

Workshop Day 3: Bring to class 6-9 brief examples that you think demonstrate 2-3 themes in your data. Separately, write brief definitions of each theme. Look for themes in each othersÕ data before sharing your own themes and discuss.

 

Conversation and Discourse Analysis

 

Wednesday September 28

PerŠkylŠ, A. (2008) Analyzing Talk and Text.  In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln, Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials, 3rd Edition. 351-374

 

Gee, J. P. (1999) ÒAn Example of Discourse AnalysisÓ In An Introduction to Discourse Analysis. 119-148.

 

Monday October 4

Workshop Day 4: Bring to class 3-5 examples from your data in which we can see patterns of the sort PerŠkylŠ or Gee describe. Write a 2-3 page analysis of one such pattern that includes at least 3 examples.

Critical Analysis

Wednesday October 5:

Fairclough, N. & Wodak, R. (1997). Critical discourse analysis. In T. Van Dijk, Discourse as social interaction, 258-284. Sage: London.

 

DÕEnbeau, S. & Buzzanell, P. M. (2011) Selling (Out) Feminism: Sustainability of ideology-viability tensions in a competitive marketplace, Communication Monographs 78(1) 27-52.

Discourse Tracing

 

Monday October 10: No in-class meeting.

LeGreco, M., & Tracy, S.J. (2009). Discourse tracing as qualitative practice. Qualitative Inquiry, 15, 1516-1543.

 

Workshop Day 5: Post to Blackboard: You now have some familiarity with your own and your teamÕs data.  What critical issues could be unpacked in your data? Respond to the posts by others in your team. Are there other critical issues that you see?

Qualitative Analysis Software

 

Wednesday October 12: No in-class meeting.

Watch tutorials on these three options:

Introduction to NVivo: http://download.qsrinternational.com/Document/NVivo8/NVivo8-Introducing-NVivo.htm

The university offers graduate student access to NVivo, but in a fairly restrictive way.

Dedoose: http://www.dedoose.com/LearnMore/VideoTour.aspx

The first month of Dedoose is free, consider signing up and fooling around with it. AtlasTI: http://www.youtube.com/user/ATLASti01

Coding and Honing

 

Monday October 17

Charmaz, K. ÒCoding in Grounded Theory PracticeÓ in Constructing Grounded Theory. Sage

 

Wednesday October 19: Saldana, J. (2009) An introduction to codes and coding. In The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers, Sage.

 

Monday October 24

Workshop Day 6: Bring to class a brief coding manual and copies of sample data to go around.

 

Wednesday October 26

ÒMemo-writingÓ in Charmaz, K. Constructing Grounded Theory. Sage

 

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). ÒMatrix displays: rules of thumbÓ Chapter 9 in Qualitative Data Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

 

Monday October 31

Workshop Day 7: Bring a matrix analysis of your data and a memo you have written based on that matrix analysis.

Drilling in and Elaborating

 

Wednesday November 2

Charmaz, K.  ÒTheoretical Sampling, Saturation and SortingÓ and ÒReconstructing Theory in Grounded Theory StudiesÓ in Constructing Grounded Theory. Sage

 

Ten Have, P.  (1999). ÒElaborating the Analysis.Ó Chapter 7 In Doing Conversation Analysis, 130-157

 

Monday November 7

 

Workshop Day 8: Bring a 1-2 page analysis of how you might bring theory to bear or start to build theoretical explanations for the phenomena in your own data. Discuss this regarding the other team membersÕ data.

Participant Structure Analysis

 

Wednesday November 9

Goffman, E. (1981). Footing. In E. Goffman, Forms of talk, (pp. 124-159). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.

 

Schiffrin, D. (1993) ÔSpeaking for anotherÓ in sociolinguistic interviews: Alignments, identities and frames. In D. Tannen (ed) Framing in Discourse. 231-263 Oxford University: New York

 

Monday November 14 (may be a post to Blackboard and respond to each other there day):

Workshop Day 9: Bring a 1-2 page analysis of the identities at play in your data with at least one specific example to demonstrate how those identities are constructed through communication. 

 

Narrative Analysis

Wednesday November 16

Ochs, E. (2007). Narrative. In T. Van Dijk, Discourse as structure and process, 185-207. Sage: London.

 

Chase. S. E. (2008) Narrative inquiry: Multiple lenses, approaches, voices. In N. (2008) Denzin & Y. Lincoln, Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials, 3rd Edition, 57-94.

 

Monday November 21

Workshop Day 10: Bring to class an example of at least one narrative that occurs in your data and a brief written summary of what analysis of this narrative reveals. Discuss what you see in one anotherÕs narratives and the means through which that meaning is constructed communicatively.

 

Wednesday November 23: NO CLASS - THANKSGIVING BREAK

Writing

Monday November 28

Charmaz, K. ÒWriting the DraftÓ and  ÒReflecting on the Research ProcessÓ Constructing Grounded Theory. Sage.

 

Final Presentations

Wednesday November 30

 

 

 

Monday December 5

 

 

 

Wednesday December 7

 

 

Final Papers Due Wednesday December 14, 11 am.